Power Struggle Continues With Unbalanced EPA Talks

Inter Press Service (Johannesburg) 21 September 2007
By David Cronin

African nations have been reduced to "begging" in negotiations on their future economic ties with the European Union (EU) in what has turned into exercise "assaulting democracy," according to trade unionists and policy analysts from both north and south.

Trade talks have intensified in recent weeks between the EU's executive, the European Commission (EC), and representatives of African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) governments. The Commission wants ACP countries to sign market-opening deals known as Economic Partnership Agreements (EPA) with it by the end of this year.

Timothy Kondo from the trade union umbrella group Alternatives to Neoliberalism in Southern Africa (ANSA) said that the Commission has not been taking the concerns of poor countries seriously in the talks. Instead, it has been concentrated on reducing obstacles faced by western firms wishing to do business abroad.

"The attitude of the EU has to change," Kondo told IPS. "Our governments in Africa have not been negotiating in the proper sense of the word. They have not been involved in what we trade unionists call collective bargaining. They have been involved in collective begging."

"That is not to blame our governments. You shouldn't blame the weak. The level of development between Europe and Africa is not the same. But the focus of the EPAs has been on removing barriers to trade between partners that are not equal," Kondo continued.

Kondo took part in a Sep. 18 conference on the EPAs organised by left-wing members of the European Parliament.

He complained that suggestions put forward by ACP governments during the talks have been rejected by EU officials.

ACP countries have long argued, for example, that the talks should not cover such topics as competition, investment and government procurement. Yet the draft EPAs prepared by the Commission in the past few months have contained provisions on these issues, which primarily relate to the access that foreign firms would have to ACP markets.

Marc Maes, a trade campaigner with the Belgian anti-poverty group 11.11.11, said that most of the six ACP regional configurations with which the EU has been negotiating have refused to accept the Commission's drafts. "West Africa has been very explicit on that," he noted.

Nonetheless, the Commission has decided to keep its proposals on the table. "The texts that the Commission has tabled have reflected the Commission's approach to global trade," said Maes. "They do not reflect the interests and needs of ACP countries."

The Commission has threatened to impose punitive tariffs on ACP exports bound for Europe if their governments do not sign EPAs by Dec. 31.

Earlier this month, the European commissioner for trade Peter Mandelson told members of the European Parliament (MEPs) that he would not consider offering more preferential treatment to ACP countries than the EU's general system of tariffs if the Dec. 31 deadline cannot be met.

London Green MEP Caroline Lucas said that she had become accustomed to Mandelson's "very blunt manner" from his involvement in British politics during his time the closest confidant to former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair. "But even I was shocked by the aggressive and bullying tone he adopted (in ruling out alternatives to the EPAs)," she said.

Addressing the European Parliament's international trade committee on Sep. 11, Mandelson said it was "irresponsible" for anti-poverty activists to claim that tariffs would not have to be imposed on ACP countries if they do not sign the EPAs by the end of this year.

Mandelson maintained he has "no legal option" other than imposing tariffs in such an eventuality under rules set by the World Trade Organisation. A waiver to WTO rules applying to current EU-ACP trading arrangements will expire on Jan. 1 2008.

"I have no hat and no rabbit to pull out of it," Mandelson said.

Mamadou Cissokho, president of the Network of Peasant Organisations and Producers in West Africa (ROPPA), said that ACP governments "are not negotiating, they are simply reacting to proposals put to us by Europe." "European Union documents have been taken as the basis of our negotiations," he said. "And all of the negotiation meetings have been funded by the EU."

He pointed out that the EU spends 130 billion dollars per year on agricultural subsidies, even though farmers comprise just 4 percent of the Union's population. Despite the huge competitive advantage enjoyed by European farmers, the Commission has urged ACP governments to reduce, and in many cases eliminate, the tariffs they apply to food imports from Europe.

Such trade liberalisation will have profound implications for small-scale African farmers and "jeopardise" the continent's ability to feed itself, according to Cissokho. "Opening up markets willy-nilly means the traditional production methods we have in Africa are not going to be guaranteed or maintained," he said.

Italian MEP Vittorio Agnoletto said that the Commission is trying to "claim that David and Goliath are equal" in the EPA talks.

"Frankly, this is a farce," he added. "In this case Goliath - that is, the EU - is playing a false hand because it is not removing agricultural subsidies aimed at its exports."

Agnoletto voiced concerns, too, over how the Commission has suggested that the EPAs commit the ACP side to a robust protection of intellectual property rights. By doing so, he contended, countries would be impeded from circumventing patents on drugs by importing cheap generic versions of treatments for AIDS and other major diseases. Some 30 million people in Africa are HIV positive.

Alexandra Strickner from the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (AITP) in Austria argues that there had been a lack of debate in both Europe and in developing countries about the likely implications of the EPAs. It is particularly vital, she said, that parliaments should be given a formal role in scrutinising the accords.

"Mandelson is saying he would like to have the EPAs implemented immediately, without any ratification process in the ACP or in Europe," she explained. "This is an incredible assault on democracy."