U.S. Mission to the United Nations: Remarks at UN Security Council Briefing on Peace and Security in Africa
06/19/2014
Let me begin by thanking the Special Envoy for her briefing. Guebre
Sellassie, we welcome your taking on this critically important post and
look forward to working with you.
I also wish to thank the Secretary General for his comprehensive report, and for his leadership on this issue.
As we come together to discuss the implementation of the United
States--United Nations Integrated Strategy for the Sahel, it is worth
noting that this entire initiative is built on the premise that serious
security challenges facing the Sahel are, by definition, regional
challenges. Whether it is groups of extremists carrying out attacks
across borders, droughts leading to regional food insecurity, or a
humanitarian crisis in one country that displaces refugees to several
others – these problems are not isolated to any one State. Nor can the
solutions be.
In order to address these complex, transnational problems
effectively, we need to come up with regional solutions. And we need to
enlist the full range of actors in carrying out these solutions,
including governments, multilateral and regional institutions, NGOs, and
civil society groups.
I would divide the challenges we face in the Sahel – and by “we” I
mean all of us who care about the region and its people and who see its
security and stability as tied to our own – into two categories.
The first consists of the emergencies and immediate crises, such as
the current instability in Libya or the deteriorating situation in
northern Mali, where we have seen renewed fighting.
I would also count the growing threat posed by Boko Haram. Because,
while it was the group’s brazen kidnapping of schoolgirls that captured
international headlines – and, let me be clear, the outrage their
abduction has generated is fully justified – that was not an isolated
attack. Indeed, Boko Haram was attacking innocent civilians long before
that incident. And it has continued to mount attacks, with alarming
regularity and increasing lethality, since then. Just a few weeks ago,
the group massacred scores of citizens along Nigeria’s border with
Cameroon. It is estimated that the group has killed more than1,800
civilians this year alone.
There is a clear consensus that the deeds of these extremists – like
the instability in Mali and Libya – must be met with a coordinated,
international response.
That consensus was reflected in the ministerial meeting hosted last
week by the UK government – at which foreign ministers of Cameroon,
Chad, Niger, and Nigeria, as well as representatives of the EU, France,
Canada, the UN, the AU, and my government, agreed upon a unified
response to the crisis in Nigeria. That meeting produced concrete
commitments from all of the participating countries, from beefing up the
Multinational Joint Task Force to strengthening sanctions against Boko
Haram’s leaders at the international and national level, to ensure that
neither their militants nor their coffers find safe haven.
That consensus is reflected at the regional level as well, has been
reflected in the ongoing work of the Ministerial Coordination Platform,
which brings together five Sahelian governments to collaborate on
security and development issues.
That same consensus undergirds President Obama’s announcement a few
weeks ago of the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund, which is aiming to
work with allies and partners worldwide to respond to the evolving
threat posed by violent extremism – including in the Sahel.
The second category of challenges in the Sahel consists of the
longer-term, chronic problems faced by the region – such as widespread
environmental degradation, chronic food insecurity, and the lack of
opportunities for the region’s youth. To cite one alarming statistic: at
least 20 million people are at risk of food insecurity in the Sahel,
and nearly 5 million children are at risk of acute malnutrition.
These chronic, long-term problems may seem less pressing on the
surface. But left unaddressed, chronic problems become crises; and
crises demand urgent and often more costly or risk-fraught responses.
So, if we know that youth under the age of 25 form the largest
constituency in the Sahel, and that they are the hardest hit by growing
unemployment in the region; and if we know that young people who have no
opportunities are particularly vulnerable to radicalization and
recruitment into extremist groups; then we must invest more in expanding
opportunities for young men and women in the region.
I would like to offer a few recommendations as we continue to work together to address these challenges in the Sahel.
While we are on the right track towards adopting a regional,
multilateral approach to these complex problems – we need to improve our
coordination. This means being more mindful of avoiding overlap and
prioritizing resources, to ensure that the ones we have provided are
used in the most efficient and effective way possible.
Second, we must invest in prevention, and we must invest in
resilience. We need to do a better job of addressing the long-term,
chronic problems before they metastasize into urgent and large-scale
crises.
My government is doing this right now, through programs like RISE –
the Resilience in the Sahel-Enhanced Initiative. Announced in February
by the U.S. Agency for International Development, its premise is simple:
you invest in making the most vulnerable populations more resilient, so
they can bounce back when the inevitable crisis comes – whether it’s a
drought, flood, or some other unforeseen, but predictable disaster. The
United States has dedicated $130 million to RISE over its first two
years. The program is already implementing a range of projects, such as
promoting the cultivation of hardier crops in Niger, and working to
reduce acute malnutrition in Burkina Faso.
We, the United Nations, have also been doing this through a number of
smaller initiatives, like many of those mentioned by the Secretary
General in his report. In one of those initiatives, in Mali, UNDP
brought together 100 civil society groups to promote the involvement of
women in the peace process and local-level dialogue. While programs like
this may not stop the fighting in Mali immediately – they can help
empower communities to mitigate the violence, and they can lay the
foundations for building future peace.
I am convinced that if we can address these problems collectively and
collaboratively; and if we are willing to not only react to the
emergencies, but also to do more to anticipate them and to address their
root causes; then we will be able to make the Sahel more peaceful and
more prosperous, which is in all of our interests. We are confident that
the integrated strategy encapsulates these various elements.
Thank you.